audiosite
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Forums
  • Audio Engineering
    • OSX audio
    • Studio Recording >
      • Loudness Wars
      • Analogue Tape
      • Recording History
    • Pro Tools
    • Sound for Picture
    • Sound Theory
    • Practical Acoustics
    • Surround Sound
    • Speakers & Amplifiers >
      • Headphones
    • Electronics
    • Snake Oil
  • Music Technology
    • Music Theory
    • MIDI
    • Synthesis
    • Sampling
    • Logic >
      • Environment
  • Keyboards
    • KX88
    • SV-1
    • P2000
    • PC3
    • ETI Synth
    • T200
    • DX7
    • PolyMoog
    • Vintage Synths
    • Vox Jaguar
  • Odds and Sods
    • Vinyl
    • Recording History
    • Calculators
    • LPFM Radio
    • Free Stuff >
      • Freeware
      • eBooks
    • Books
    • Church Sound
    • Sibelius
    • Maths
    • Guitar
    • UK visit 1999
  • Search
  • Links
    • Video Tutorials
    • Search Engines
    • Magazines
    • Sound Theory
    • Acoustics >
      • Psycho-Acoustics
    • Electronics
    • Loudspeakers
    • MIDI >
      • Jingles
      • Synthesis
    • Studio Recording >
      • Analogue Recording
      • NZ Studios
      • Digital Recording
    • Music Theory >
      • Songwriting
      • Western & World Music
    • Radio
    • Sound for Picture
    • Multimedia
    • Music Industry
    • Music & Culture
  • Site Map

less is more

4/7/2010

0 Comments

 
In the old days (ie last Century) there were quantitative limits. Limits to the number of tracks on the multitrack, limits to the number of track bounces before the noise floor gobbled up the signal, and a finite amount of signal processing and FX gear. With good rack equipment costing several thousands of dollars per rack space (btw a rack space = 1.75") a lot of sessions used most if not all of the compressors, EQs, gates, and reverb units available. Beyond that it was a case of borrowing / hiring more gear, or doing without.
Fast forward to today and using plugins on a DAW on a fast computer and the opposite applies. It is often possible to have as many as you want. Of course, there are times when lots of nip / tuck operations are useful (eg EQ before and after a compressor), but I have seen things such as two EQs in a channel cancelling out each others effect. The same goes for putting an expander directly after a compressor. So...try to stay focused and every so often step back and give your mix a plug-in reality check. Maybe you have gone too far due to being too close, and taking an effect out will actually improve the sound.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Richard Hallum
    NZCE, MMusTech, Dip Tch (Ter).
    memberships: APRA, AES, 
    NZ Acoustical Society, ALMA.

    Archives

    June 2017
    August 2016
    September 2015
    November 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010

    Categories

    All
    Acoustics
    All
    Anything Else
    Audio Engineering
    Keyboards
    Leprechauns
    Music

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.